By Mathias Eichler
Sponsor:
The Trail Running Film Festival - Online Watch Party Get your tickets.
The Trail Running Film Festival - Online Watch Party Get your tickets.
UTMB Index Races are independently organized races that register with UTMB, submit the results after the conclusion of the event and runners receive an index based on their performance. My Beast of Big Creek race is an Index race and runners running the sky race are receiving an Index for the 20km distance:
The UTMB Index is composed of 1000’s of independent races from all across the world. Upon completing a UTMB Index race runners will be awarded their UTMB Index.
In the aftermath of the ‘Whistler kerfuffle’ (and I do hope I can stop talking about it at some point, or maybe I like it, who knows) several race directors have chosen not to renew their inclusion in the index and taken their races out.
Jason Reathaford of the Badger Mountain Challenge in southwest Washington mentioned on social media that he will not include his races in the Index anymore (sorry, I couldn’t find the link to the comment he posted). I suppose running Squamish 50 won’t give you an index anymore. One of the most well-known East Coast races ‘Eastern States‘ in Waterville, PA announced on their Facebook page:
As of this morning, Eastern States 100 and the Eastern States Trail-Endurance Alliance have cut ties with UTMB. We are ending our status as an “Index Race”, and will no longer be associated in any way with the UTMB/Ironman organization. We make this decision with sadness and disappointment, but it is the right thing to do, and we hope that other race organizations, businesses, and individuals will do the same.
I actually expect there to be a significant drop in Index races in North America. It’s just so easy for RDs to not renew their participation.
The race director Jeff Calvert adds a longer explanation on his Substack:
I see this as an intervention, something you do for a loved one who has gone astray. Saying that “UTMB has lost its way” implies that it might find its way back.
I want this be much less “we hate you and everything you touch” and much more “we love you, man, but what you’re doing right now is not acceptable”.
Jeff Calvert ran UTMB himself in 2016 and knows that the event has been part of the fabric of trail and ultra running for twenty years and counting. And he still has some hope:
But that brings me back to my hope, that this incident — and our response to it — might be a wake-up call, both for us as a sport and a community, and for whatever is left of Old UTMB within New UTMB.
Sending a message is good, and high time. And that message needs to be addressed to UTMB, “New UTMB” as he calls it. The organization that’s currently missing the beat of what our community is all about. Sending that message to the runners, who are deciding which races to run and dreams to chase might be the wrong message. Deciding for runners, by taking an opportunity away from folks to get their index points isn’t great.
Gary Robbins on his blog on behalf of is business partner Geoff Langford and the rest of the team at Coast Mountain Trail Running:
We do not feel the need to take this any further and have a PR duel in the town square.
They are clearly done with Whistler as a location, Vail Resorts and as a potential business partner.
And he opens another door he can control and actually wants to operate:
We as a tandem here need to shift our focus back to the work we love, which is preparing another season of the best events possible, for the communities we operate in, and the runners and volunteers who attend them. And of course there’s also that whole looming 10 week deadline to get a new race off the ground now too lol.
As an observer of our industry and on behalf of this tiny media outlet I would love for Gary to make the rounds, show up on every podcast, speak to every media outlet asking him for a snippet of opinion and insight into this kerfuffle, heck I’d love to have him on Singletrack to chat about all this.
As a human being, I understand that sometimes you just gotta wipe your hand, walk away from it all, and focus on what matters.
In the business world that’s how the big guys usually win. By staying always guarded and on message, never divulging too much and just plowing along. Whistler by UTMB is going to happen. The event will have a stench on it for awhile. Nothing really ever gets fully resolved, shit is messy sometimes. But in business that’s how it often goes, the only motions is endless forward progress and sometimes people are being sacrificed in the wake. Gary’s CMTR races will continue to flourish and he’ll be the champion of everyone’s heart.
Life is not a zero sum game and everyone sometimes can win. Win at whatever game everyone set out to play.
Back in January Andy Jones-Wilkins wrote in a blog post on iRunFar:
Whether intended or not, High Lonesome’s policy has the effect of dividing the running community into “UTMB runners” and “non-UTMB runners.” By forcing athletes into making this black and white choice, High Lonesome is perpetuating the divisiveness we see in so much of society today.
…
How do I know that the values of UTMB and Ironman do not “reflect the values of the sport?”
Seems like this Whistler kerfuffle changed AJW’s mind, as it did with many people. On his latest episode of his podcast ‘Crack a Brew with AJW‘ he announces that he’s done with UTMB, praises High Lonesome for seeing Ironman as the “big evil corporation” early on, and seems be in favor now of creating two running camps.
Back on X/Twitter:
I am pleased to share that representatives from the UTMB group have reached out to me to share thoughts on their partnership with Ironman.
Curious what this will lead to. Stay tuned.
From the ‘Advertising tab’ on UltraSignupNews:
We boast a dedicated base of over 5M annual visitors, 650K active emails, and 6,000 races.
And more:
Our 5M annual runners make up 45% of total U.S trail running participation.
This are some fantastic numbers for UltraSignup, and for us to digest and mull over.
For example: the UTMB World Series has 41 events globally. So if we guesstimate an average of 4 races per event and an average of 1,500 runners per event we’re looking at 164 events and 246,000 race entries globally. In North America UTMB owns six events (not counting Western States), 17 race distances with I am guessing an average of 400 runners each? So UTMB is offering 6,800 race entries in North America.
If we consider 6,000 races on UltraSignup (predominately in the US) and guesstimate an average of 200 race entries we’re looking at 1,200,000 race entries available on UltraSignup.
So, UTMB is offering as many RACE ENTRIES in North America as UltraSignup lists RACES. But, tell me again how UTMB is a monopoly?
Brand new trail race, announced just today:
100 mile mountain trail run on much of Mt. Hood’s most diverse and famous terrain! Featuring a super crew-accessible lollipop-style course with 17,700’ of ascent and 17,700’ descent, Hood Hundred offers a truly epic and memorable mountain trail endurance run experience.
Same weekend (Aug 3/+4, 2024) as my Beast of Big Creek race, but I won’t call them a monopoly. This new event is also on the same weekend as Go Beyond Racing’s popular Volcanic 50 and Wonderland Running’s Dark Divide races. This means, the first weekend in August will now have trail races on Mt. Rainier, Mt. St. Helens and Mt. Hood. Daybreak Racing has now 11 races in their portfolio. UTMB has seven in North America (including it’s partnership with Western States).
With all this talk about UTMB being SO expensive, it’s worth pointing out again that US trail races are in general more expensive. But further, I wouldn’t even be surprised if race directors are secretly hoping that UTMB would charge more so it creates a ceiling for them to fit under. And if you come back at me saying that UTMB is so expensive because they require qualification into their lottery by acquiring stones then I would just tell you to sit tight and wait for the local race to sell out year after year and see what lottery/requirements the local RD thinks up to manage the growing interest in their races.
Again, no shade here at Daybreak, this race looks like a fantastic addition to the PNW trail racing scene. And if Daybreak thinks it can add more races to the calendar then it seems to me that our sport and community is ready to handle more events in general. We seem to not be maxed out yet.
Matt Walsh with another great article on his Substack summarizing the last few days in our little world:
Trail running as a sport won’t grow sustainably if we leave the future of the sport to Race Directors alone.
Matt’s responding here to a comment made by David Callaghan of UltraSignUp on the future of our sport. Matt suggests that race directors aren’t in a position, or shouldn’t carry the burden in “saving trail running”. He continues:
Maybe I’ve just been living under a Tory government for over 10 years and know all too well about the effects of leaving it up to the market to right itself, but as this UTMB debate has shown, the playing field is not currently even so we can’t put all the pressure on RDs to be the determinants of the future of trail running.
I can’t argue with that point of view, but looking for an overarching organization to lead us through this might be waiting in vain. Have you heard of FIFA, or the Olympic Committee?
The monopolisation of trail running is occurring because ITRA/WMRA/IAU don’t have any power.
And again, UTMB isn’t even close to monopolization our sport. They might be monopolization our sports’ media, but that is sort of our own fault.
My take, which I’ve made before, is that local race directors do have actually a lot of power, because they aren’t just offering a product/service to purchase (a race entry) but are creating community through their local partnerships and how the manage, attract and engage with volunteers. Yes, I am talking about volunteers again. No race works without them. And UTMB’s current strategy to attract and retain volunteers is currently not even in the same universe compared to the way local race directors treat their volunteers. People might sign up to run a UMTB event to get stones, but if these races don’t have enough/good/the right volunteers, the negative experience can’t be obscured with enough HOKA banners at the finish line. So, race directors might just have the power to control, and keep controlling the narrative. Even if they lose out on the best locations, don’t offer livestreams and stones, and don’t have the media constantly reporting their every move.
One caveat here: What do we think, how starstruck are volunteers? If pro athletes only run UTMB races because their sponsor contracts requires them to dance on the biggest stages, will these elite runners attract volunteers to the big races, despite the lack of recognition and care by the race organization? Will volunteers sign up to sit at an aid station for hours in the hope that Courtney or Jim zoom by? How big is that draw?
Singletrack – Episode 287:
Wes Plate runs long, and I mean really long distances. In many ways I can’t even wrap my head around days of running on end, but I do understand and marvel at the motivation and the story telling through creative route creation. His latest project of running 200 miles around the Puget Sound in Western Washington is both equally mind-blowing and inspiring.
Wes also shares some news on his race directing debut at the Copper Kings 100 in Montana, slated of the summer of 2024.
Back in January of this year, in response to High Lonesome 100’s ‘anti UTMB policy’ I wrote:
But clearly, it would do UTMB a ton of good if they wouldn’t just drip out faceless press releases week after week announcing their endless expansion, but instead put some faces to their ever-growing organization and make their moves a bit more transparent, and… well, friendly and personal to us as runners.
We’re now almost a year later and UTMB is slowly expanding its empire, albeit slower than I anticipated (there’s still no announcement of an American Major). But this past week has clearly given the ‘naysayers’ and ‘slipper slope predictors’ a ton of cannon fodder. The Whistler by UTMB race announcement couldn’t have gone any worse. Overnight the trail world seems to have split into two fractions, the UTMB and anti-UTMB crowd. How many people who previously wanted to race UTMB and since have abandoned their plans waits to be seen but overall this is not a great trend. We don’t need to build walls and trenches. And before you yell at me, telling I’m taking the side of “the aggressor” here, breathe for a second.
UTMB is going to be part of our sport. The race in Chamonix won’t go away. How we qualify might change over time and even Ironman might change their expansion plans in the coming years, but for now, UTMB is part of our trail landscape and our trail running media landscape. Currently their expansion might be successful on a spreadsheet (I would assume it’s too early to tell, even for them) but where they are clearly failing is in positioning themselves on the North American market as a trusted player and welcome neighbor in our community. Being “an elephant in a china shop” isn’t working and their team needs to make adjustments.
I said it before and I’m bringing it back up because it feels more pertinent than before: UTMB needs proper representation here in North America. I highly suggest that Ironman doesn’t try to run its operation over here via fiat. Hire a well-know spokesperson, someone the community knows and trust. Let that person play community liaison and explainer of their moves. Someone who stands up and says: This is what we’re doing and why we’re doing it. Rather than present everything via email press release (that’s how I found out about the Whistler race), have someone go on a media offense and present their plans. These new events are a big enough deal that it requires it. It can’t be that hard to find a “director of race directors”. Someone who represents all their local races on the ground. Someone who can go on record when a new race is announced. And someone who truly understands the North American trail running community. UTMB’s moves are under way too much scrutiny to let the local race director take that on. They are busy trying to build a successful event. I actually feel bad for the new Whistler RD trying to manage this situation that has evolved up there in BC. And in extend, I feel bad for every RD that’s currently hired to organize an UTMB event. They have a lot of explaining to do at their next group run.
But the larger community is watching, and it would behoof the Ironman organization to acknowledge this and be better prepared.
Team RunRun’s coach Laurie Porter shares some super helpful inside on how to prep for and taper for a 10K, or more specifically Rock Candy Running’s Saturnalia:
Whether you are an experienced runner or a newbie, tapering sets you up for success on race day. It doesn’t matter if your goal is to simply finish the race, or if you are aiming to set a personal record, tapering well is going to help you be your best on race day.
You have until Halloween night to sign up for Saturnalia and save some dough with our early bird pricing. See you on December 16th at Squaxin Park in Olympia, Washington.
Just for folks playing along in the online shitstorm creation game a quick reminder: UTMB is not a monopoly, not even close.
The definition for a monopoly:
Exclusive control by one group of the means of producing or selling a commodity or service.
UTMB is not controlling every single race out there, you are not forced to run their races. Their races aren’t the only option for you to enjoy trail running. They currently own 6 races in the North America and partner with a seventh (Western States).
Rock Candy Running, my race company, operates three. Rainshadow Running operated eight, Aravaipa has over fifty! on their annual calendar.
There’s plenty to complain, criticize and question about UTMB/Ironman’s partnership and operation, but spreading misinformation doesn’t help anyone’s case.
If “trail running is supposed to save the world”, we, claiming to be their voices and stewards, gotta do better.
Brian Metzler for Trailrunner has some more backstory on how this UTMB-Gary-Vail-Whistler kerfuffle went down, including some valuable first person responses by spokespeople for the various entities:
UTMB’s take:
Ironman-UTMB officials who developed the new event said Friday they were surprised at Robbins’s reaction because he and his event partner Geoff Langford had voluntarily chosen to cancel its proposed September 2023 event during the application process back in February, saying on February 10 that CMTR would not pursue any further events in Whistler and, after six successful editions, there was “no path forward for us to produce races of this magnitude.”
Keats McGonigal, Ironman’s North American vice president of operations goes further:
“It was our understanding, based on Gary’s public comments, that he was exiting the Whistler market and had no intention of ever going back,” McGonigal said. “That was our understanding based on what he had put out publicly back in February. So we were taken a little bit aback because it’s like, ‘Hey, you guys said that you were out of there and you weren’t going back. So if you’re going to leave a market, then you’re going to leave a market.”
Whistler Blackcomb on the challenges to obtain a permit which lead to CMT walking away from WAM:
“What this comes down to is we simply were not satisfied or comfortable with how Whistler Alpine Meadows planned to address safety issues from the race the year prior,” Whistler Blackcomb’s release said. “We will not compromise on safety as it is our number one priority, and we should note that our safety protocols and policies have not changed significantly year over year. We were not willing to move forward with the 2023 race without an adequate safety and medical plan, and WAM was unwilling to work with us on this.”
This is sort of the nugget of it all:
Although CMTR announced it had permanently walked away from the event in its February 10 post on Instagram, Robbins seemed to contradict that in his blog. He wrote that, as recently as last summer, he and Langford were optimistic they would renew a dialogue with the resort for holding the WAM events in 2024 after their previous resort contact had been replaced. He even suggested that, for the past five weeks, the CMTR team had been “holding our collective breath about a hopeful surprise announcement to the community that we’d be returning to Whistler next year!”
IF! Every person so far has spoken the truth, then this sort of comes down to a cold blooded business decision: “Hey, there’s a race course that has opened up, we’ll just grab it.” Is this fair? Is this respectful? Is it right to feel like you own a region for yourself? Could this have been handled differently and better?
Paul Huddle, Ironman’s senior director for global trail running operations concludes:
We’re all stewards of this amazing sport, and we need to band together more than go apart. But again, I get it. Ironman, UTMB, we’re the big bad wolf … we’re the corporate whatever. I understand that and I empathize with that. But I do think there’s an opportunity here for both.
You know, you don’t have to be the ‘big bad wolf’. If you represent a corporate entity you don’t have to make it so easy for everyone to hate you. You don’t have to own the title ‘big bad wolf’ by acting like one. These past 24 hours felt like the collective trail running world has announced that there shouldn’t be room for a ‘big bad wolf’. Can there be room for a global corporate entity that is good, respectful, smart and kind in our sport?
UTMB/Ironman, you get to choose what role you want to play and what names we call you as a result.
Dominic Grossman gives us the most obvious solution out of this Whistler/Ironman/UTMB/Vail mess in form of nothing else than a GoFundMe, because of course:
Hi, this is Dominic and Andy, good friends of race director Gary Robbins. To put it mildly, Gary got screwed by Big Running. His ultra, WAM that he has put on for 5 years in Whistler mysteriously stopped getting permits from Vail Resorts. Then on October 26th, UTMB announced that they were now putting on an ultra at Whistler.
That’s when it became clear to us: UTMB is ruining trail running. And the only feasible solution is for Gary Robbins to buy their race for 50 million dollars and save the sport from moral bankruptcy.
The Big Running vs. Big Beard showdown we’ve all been waiting for.
Read the whole thing, it’s worth every word. The story is just as bad as one would have thought. Vail fucked up badly but this is the part that’s most crucial new piece in the puzzle:
In 2021 during the pandemic we were contacted via the IM-UTMB group about potentially acquiring our Squamish50 races. I said we were not interested and we moved on. One year later, in 2022 they reached out a second time. By this point I knew two race directors who I respected that’d decided to sell to them. I also heard through a verified source that two more highly respected race directors in the US were also in conversations with them about a potential acquisition. Geoff & I have been doing this now for 11 years now, and the first 5 were a major struggle to make ends meet. Given the unique opportunity on the table we decided, after an incredible amount of dialogue between us and our families, that we might as well hear them out. We signed an NDA and had a single zoom meeting with them. I was completely torn about this and cannot say with any certainty what we would have done had we been tabled an offer. Above all else we would never compromise what we’d built by allowing a major entity to not honour our values. On the single zoom meeting we had with this group I came forth by saying there were “many non-negotiables” on my end, meaning our community support programs, our volunteer appreciation programs, etc. The response was simply that that’d be a conversation for another time. The last we’d heard from them was in late June saying they were putting a pause on this for the short term.
Good luck with that strategy UTMB/Ironman. You will fail, or as a well-known and very well-positioned race director said to me at the US Trail Running Conference this past weekend: “I’ll give them five years and this UTMB World Series will fail.”
Here it is. The inevitable has come true. UTMB/Ironman announced a new event in North America and for the first time it’s not just a rebranded/acquired/previously existing event, but a brand new one. Except it’s not.
For the past 5 years Gary Robbins’ Coast Mountain Trail Running held the Whistler Alpine Meadows on the trails of Whistler Blackcomb resort. But the resort, under new ownership of conglomerate Vail Resorts didn’t renew the permit and the event was permanently cancelled just this past February.
The race is in a perfect location. I previously said, when Gary Robbins announced Whistler Alpine Meadows that this location has the makeup to become THE UTMB location in North America. A lot has changed since, but the mountains still exist and the location is still incredible. It’s close to a major city, close to an international airport. The trails aren’t at insane altitude (my personal favorite!) and most of the trails are in a resort, so permitting should be straightforward. So one thinks.
Fast forward a few years and Coast Mountain has had a few challenging COVID years (which RD hasn’t) and then the announcement arrives last February that WAM is dropped due to Gary and team not being able to come to terms with Vail Resorts.
So a beloved, albeit new-ish and not without complications (grizzlies, snow…) race is shut down. Not unheard of, but still somewhat surprising because it certainly felt that Coast Mountain had wanted to continue to operate it. CMT is clearly a highly regarded, professional organization that shouldn’t have any problems getting permits for an event like this. CMT didn’t walk away from it due to ‘difficulties’ or ‘lack of runners’, they couldn’t get a permit from resort owner Vail. No real reason given beyond that, but rumors have been floating through the grapevine that Vail was particularly complicated in trying to make this event happen. It almost felt like they didn’t want WAM. Which is surprising because Whistler has had a history of summer trail events beyond mountain biking and even after Vail took over several events continued to operate.
In any case we now see what this expansion is going to look like. Here in North America UTMB/Ironman still doesn’t seem to be able to find good locations for races unless someone did the legwork for them. So they end up buying an existing race or in this case, taking the work someone else did and stepping in and in many ways all over.
Should this be an unsettling reminder for race directors? Is this the turning point on how that Ironman/UTMB partnership is perceived in the community? Is this fair game? Squamish was oversold over year anyways and Gary walked away from Whistler. Is it just a blip in the news cycle and we all just move on and sign up to race anyways because the draw to race in Chamonix is just too great?
One thing is clear, the initial reaction online about this event is all negative. There’s a lot of behind the scenes moaning that this is, on paper, the perfect event – and this in the end might be UTMB’s financial saving grace, but the stench stays. And while this might not affect registrations this could really bite UTMB in the ass when it comes to getting folks to volunteer. I am not envying race director Christine Cogger, who previously managed the Ironman Canada in Whistler, to try to build an event under these circumstances.
The first brand new* UTMB event in North America was announced today in one of the most perfect locations for an international trail race. The dates are set for September 28-29 and the distances are 25K, 55K, 100K.
The event is added to the ECC UTMB Events Calendar.
* While this is technically the first race in North America that UTMB didn’t acquire but start from the ground up, the event runs on many of the same trails as Gary Robbins’ Whistler Alpine Meadow race. It’s even held during the same time of year. Coast Mountain cancelled their WAM race just this past February citing irresolvable differences with resort owner Vail.
Team RunRun Coach Keith Laverty:
I’m racing the Saturnalia 10k in Olympia, WA this December, and I think you should join me, or at least join me in racing some sub-ultra distance trail races! Why should you join me? The quick answer: Racing a 10k trail race is for anyone and everyone (especially the Saturnalia race!) Regardless of experience level or ability, the 10k distance can serve as a great goal for anyone interested in running on trails. And better yet: The Saturnalia 10k event has no cut-offs and offers a supportive community of runners that celebrates each and every runner who shows up to the start line.
Join me and Keith this December and come race the fun, wintery Saturnalia.
Every year the Euro fashion brands release “cute knit sweaters” with even cuter winter ski scenes on them, often adding a name of one the popular resorts in the Alps. Benetton’s Cortina sweater is extra on point this year showing skiers on a ski lift with green trees below with no real snow on them. Is this a design accident or a subtle way of highlighting the realities of climate change and its effect on European ski resorts?
The 2024 World Championships for the Backyard Ultra is currently happening in Laz’s backyard, somewhere in the middle of nowhere in Tennessee. As I type this the world record is being broken in this insane and quirky race format. The folks left running are from another planet and I am not even going to post how much they’ve achieved as they are still out there grinding the miles.
What I want to point out is that a livestream is now increasingly is part of the expectation for these well-known events and are all done in the same way. I’m not even going to criticize the quality and realities of YouTube livestream limitations. What I don’t get is that embedding a livestream on your official race website is super easy but hardly anyone does this. Livestreams are mainly there to help lift the visibility of the event and therefore its sponsors. Why not build a dedicated homepage where the livestream during the event lives and pop the latest live feed in there every time YouTube forces you to restart. Ain’t that hard, creates huge brand value for yourself and your sponsors. And fans can easily share your race website rather than “search on Youtube and hope you find the current feed’.
Or is nowadays everyone using the Youtube app, rather than the browser for this and therefore websites are moot? Maybe in the evening, on your iPad or on your TV, but during the day, while working one has a browser window open to watch, right? Am I alone on this?
(This links directly to the PDF summarizing the policy in detail.)
In the ongoing effort of UTMB to increase and encourage the participation of adaptive athletes in trail running, UTMB has implemented a new adaptive athlete policy across all UTMB World Series events.
The policy reads actually pretty straightforward:
If you qualify as an adaptive athlete based on various criteria’s that seems industry standards then you can apply to run in the Adaptive Athlete Open Division and are allowed a guide with you for the duration of the race.
Just this last week the US Trail Running Conference an adaptive athletes shared a rather disappointing experience they had running one of the UTMB races at one of the sessions. I’m not sure if this policy is sufficient, but it’s a start, an acknowledging that the community exists and has desires and abilities to run even the hardest ultras. Great to see UTMB respond and build a pathway for adaptive athletes to compete.
Franco Fogliato, Salomon CEO in a press release:
For decades, we have been dedicated to finding the limits of athletic performance in Alpine and Nordic ski racing, and today we have found a moment to connect our Salomon brand purpose to the Olympic movement. I speak for every Salomon associate globally in saying that we could not be prouder today to announce that we are a Premium Olympic and Paralympic Partner of Milano Cortina 2026!
Of course Salomon has always been a much bigger force in winter sports than trail running, but nonetheless this is a big step for Salomon and an exciting one for “one of our outdoor brands”. And this too might explain a bit why Salomon has seemed to slow down in their marketing toward the outdoor market, their ambitions were set higher, much higher. In sports marketing sponsoring the Olympics is the pinnacle of achievement… and dollars spent.
(There’s a joke in here somewhere for us grungy Gen X folks.)
From the press release:
When booking their accommodation through Nirvana, runners can take advantage of competitive rates at specially selected hotels close to the event start or registration hub. Hotels will be managed by the Nirvana team to respond to runner needs through a range of services to minimise stress over the race weekend, such as an early breakfast on race day morning and dedicated support staff on site. Alongside accommodation support, Nirvana can also arrange airport and train station transfers, flights, and provide general travel and logistics advise for runners traveling alone or with their family.
Who/what is Nirvana:
Nirvana has over 20 years’ experience in supporting some of the world’s biggest sporting events, helping thousands of athletes each year with their travel, accommodation, and logistics.
Nevermind.
Moncler, one of these ‘over-the-top’ runway fashion brands you might find in fancy boutiques at your favorite European resort town actually, (and surprisingly to me) has a reason to be there. Moncler supplied the jackets for the 1954 K2 expedition by Lino Lacedelli and Achille Compagnoni. And while I act surprised, I really am not. I’m endlessly fascinated by learning about the these brands who have a long history in mountaineering.
After the Guinness Book of World Records kerfuffle from a view weeks ago Messner went on the offense meeting with Ed Viesturs with the aim to redefine, or rediscover what ‘traditional alpinism’ means, should mean and meant for the past decades.
Messner is a master in self-promotion and is using this moment to position himself as the elder statesman of alpinism, a title he clearly deserves.
Funny side note: Ed Viesturs is sponsored by Rolex, tagging every Instagram posts. Reinhold Messier wears an Apple Watch Ultra in all the pictures. Don’t think Jony Ive is following this, but if he’d see this he’d smile.
In the most ridiculous turn of events, “that German” (Eberhard Jurgalski) who a couple of weeks ago made the claim that many of the original 8,000 meter summit attempts during the pre-GPS days weren’t successful summit attempts and that these mountaineers should be stripped of their title claims. This lead to an obvious ‘shitstorm’ as the Germans like to call it (Yes, the Germans adopted the original English language word ‘shitstorm’ to describe just that. They probably liked it because it’s a compound word).
Now mere days later he offers an update to try to avoid being the most hated man in Alpinism:
German press did not correctly translate the English word “legacy” used in the original press release, but wrongly translated it to “outdated” (in German), and that is far from what it was meant. The wrong translation appeared later in the international press too. Well, actually it should have been clear that neither 8000ers.com nor Guinness wanted – or could – delete those titles.
So he blames the incident on a language translation mistake, first by the German press and then later by the Guinness Book of World Records. Well, let me translate his comments for you back in plain English:
“Oh shit, I fell in love a bit too much with my own little number game, forgot the people behind it and ended up stirring up a huge shitstorm. Now I’m afraid of getting called out and becoming irrelevant and would like to correct my mistake by blaming everyone but myself for it. Please make all these things go back to normal so I can go back to playing with my numbers.”
I promise I’ll be done with Suunto updates, but this one deserves a mention. Mammut, which previously did a watch collab with Casio just announced a new partnership with Suunto. That one feels a bit more in line and deserving of a partnership than the Casio one from a year ago, but It’s still funny that Mammut, a Swiss brand with dozens of watch companies in their backyard would partner with non-Swiss brands. For this one Mammut is featuring the Suunto Vertical ‘high-end’ mountaineering watch with a unique Mammut-branded orange watch strap. That’s about the extend of the product alignment, but hey, you can buy the Suunto Vertical now on the Mammut website, I suppose. And speaking of Suunto expanding their watch strap strategy this one reminds me of Apple’s partnership with Hermes. I wish Suunto would deliver that watch with a unique watch Mammut watch face.
I made some minor clean up updates and tweak to the UTMB Events Calendar for the upcoming year.
There are just six more events to close out the 2023 calendar year, including the Asia Major Doi Inthanon in Thailand. Still no announcement on the next American Major for 2024. I don’t know if and how this would fit into UTMB’s calendar but I still think Kodiak would make a great Major for the Americas.
There are still a couple of dates early in the year 2024 that haven’t been announced yet (Amazean Jungle, Thailand and Ultra-Trail Ninghai in China).
I also changed a couple URLs to events that previously had their own website but are now on the official UTMB.World domain. And speaking of URLs, the kodiak100.com domain is still registered with WIX but doesn’t redirect to UTMB’s site.
New open ear headphones from Suunto:
Suunto Wing is designed to be used during sports. The headphones are lightweight and sit comfortably on your head. Even when running over challenging terrain or riding down a rocky trail, Suunto Wing stays in place and let’s you enjoy your music.
Why shouldn’t Suunto release some headphones as an add one to their watches thus expanding their ecosystem. Are they any good? No idea. This will be seen in the coming weeks as reviews hit the web. What I think is a smart idea is that they are connect to the phone via the Suunto app. I assume it just creates an audio path through for anything that ‘plays’ on the phone, which is a simple solution to the fact that no company can match the tight integration that Apple offers with their AirPods.
Speaking of Suunto fighting back, this weekend, just as I was toeing the line to race at Kodiak 100K (that’s a story for another day) in Bear Lake, CA Suunto announced a new watch to their product lineup. DC Rainmaker has all the details:
Suunto has just announced their newest watch, the Suunto Race. This watch essentially takes the existing Suunto Vertical endurance-sports focused watch that was released this past spring, and gives it an AMOLED display.
Love seeing a new product announcement that’s aggressive in price rather than the usual: “Oh you want more features, well then you will forever have to be okay with the never-ending upward prize spiral”. I could actually see some folks who bought in the Vertical just a couple of month ago be a bit miffed at this product/price offering. Hope I’ll be able to get my hands on a test unit next month at TRE in Austin.
Also love the new watch bands Suunto released. Don’t love the inspiration Suunto seems to take from Apple in making cool watch bands an upsell item. The new Suunto Race is currently only available in a basic black watch band as stock item. All alternate colored bands are add on purchases.
Via press release from the Outdoor Retailer’s The Daily:
Suunto, a leader in design and innovation for sports watches, dive computers, compasses and digital services used by adventurers all over the globe, announced today that it has implemented a new system for direct distribution to a growing list of retailers throughout the United States, a key initiative as the Finnish company continues to expand its domestic footprint in North America.
It’s about time Suunto offers a response to the seemingly unstoppable march of Coros. And speaking of Coros, Suunto grabbed Dan Suher, who was previously director of global sales and marketing at Coros to lead the North American expansion strategy for Suunto. Good get!
In a press release on their news blog:
Many of our members are uncomfortable with the recent evolution of the partnership between the UTMB and the carmaker, Dacia, because of what we feel is a conflict with our values, our stated Environmental Ethical Boundaries, and our ideal vision of trail running.
This comment and effort seems to be a bit more of a level-headed approach than the ‘Change.org petition‘ floating around pre-UTMB spearheaded by the ‘The Green Runners’ while the essence of the criticism is largely the same:
I do like the approach the Pro Trail Runners Association is taking here. Doing it this way gives them a good platform to voice their concerns and discomforts. This can open a dialogue.
How UTMB is positioning the Dacia partnership is nothing new and certainly not uncommon in pro sports. Beloved local sports stadiums have their names changed all the time to reflect some corporate sponsors. Teams of the Tour de France have more brands associated to their team name and on their jersey than one can count. Most of the big marathons have a sponsor attached as top billing to their name. But just because it’s common doesn’t make it good. Naming ‘UTMB’ the ‘Dacia UTMB’ sounds kind of gross, no matter what brand is or would be attached. Well, check that if it would be called the ‘Electric Cable Car UTMB’ it would be damn rad, but I digress. Pro athletes who are hoping the sports progresses and offers more support for athletes to make a full-time living should welcome this addition as more money flowing into the sport means more for everyone. And currently the outdoor brands are the only sponsors and thus get to dictate their term. And in turn are raking in the millions without being questioned. Getting sponsor support from ‘outside the industry’ helps with leveling the playing field and offers better sponsorship terms for events.
Here are my questions for UTMB:
Some questions for the fast athletes on the frontlines calling themselves pros:
The amateur, every-person trail runner who feels that our sport should keep it’s ‘grassroots feel’.
If you take a closer look at these amazing photos you can immediately tell they come from the hands, and eyes, of Dan and Janine Patitucci and the incredible team behind ALPSinsight.
‘Best of Running’ is now in its 7th edition, and of course it’s made by a German calendar publisher.
I’ve always loved big photo calendars and am bummed this love isn’t shared by most Americans. Over here photo calendars are something you pick up at the mall in desperation if you need a holiday gift for someone you don’t really know. Not a dig, just a reality driven by our loves for electronic devices and ever-present software calendars connected to magic server clouds.
Years ago I took over the ‘Tribute of the Trail’ Calendar Project, a calendar full of trail running photo and a fundraiser for the WTA (Washington Trail Association). Sadly the calendar never sold in numbers to justify the effort getting it published.
So now, I will spend the horrendous shipping fees to get myself a cool photo calendar shipped from Germany.
Singletrack – Episode 286:
Maria Dalzot, La Sportiva athlete and registered dietitian, returns to Singletrack to chat about her action-filled summer in the Alps, crushing her race at Lavaredo 80K and later DNF-ing just as hard at CCC around Mont-Blanc. We talked about downtime family visits, interrupted hiking tours and spontaneous air travel bookings. Maria also shares her highlight of watching Courtney Courtney at Col de la Forclaz on her historic win at UTMB this year.
Is not going to make their funding goal. Kind of a bummer. And a bit surprising to me.
But maybe trying to sell 1,000 books at $65 a pop is too much for most people.
5 Days to go. If you love big beautiful photo books, do check out their campaign.
Electric Cable CarTM is a product of Einmaleins. © 2018 - 2024. All Rights Reserved.
